Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4370 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4370 is 897 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 7% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G3930 - 213 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $82.8 vs $98.02
- Up to 20% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Celeron G3930 - $0.39 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
93.42723004694837%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
79.59183673469387%
Price, $
$98.02
84%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349884 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349885 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
49.8360655737705%
Multi-Core
1043
43.331948483589535%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |