Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4370 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4370 is 897 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 16% better in Rust than Celeron G3930 - 187 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $82.8 vs $98.02
- Up to 28% better value when playing Rust than Celeron G3930 - $0.44 vs $0.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358166 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
161
86.09625668449198%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
72.1311475409836%
Price, $
$98.02
84%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
49.8360655737705%
Multi-Core
1043
43.331948483589535%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |