Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2674 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 23% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $75.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 24% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G3930 - $0.25 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i5-750 - 298 vs 296 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
296
99.32885906040269%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358114 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
298
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
75.75757575757575%
Price, $
$98.02
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-750 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |