Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 35% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $64.03 vs $98.02
- Up to 35% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Celeron G3930 - $0.34 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 3 than FX-8150 - 189 vs 187 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
187
98.94179894179894%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359800 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
65.38461538461539%
Price, $
$98.02
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359800 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |