Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1463 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 29% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $70.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 27% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Celeron G3930 - $0.36 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i3-3210 - 199 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
196
98.49246231155779%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350031 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
73.46938775510205%
Price, $
$98.02
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350031 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |