Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600 is 551 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3930 - 174 vs 167 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $74.0 vs $98.02
- Up to 27% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3930 - $0.43 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358134 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
95.97701149425288%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
72.88135593220339%
Price, $
$98.02
75%
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
47.27838258164852%
Multi-Core
1043
29.363738738738736%
Intel Core i5-6600 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |