Buy on Amazon
$82.8
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 407 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 8% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G3900 - 213 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - $39.95 vs $82.8
- Up to 49% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i3-4370 - $0.2 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
213
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
51.28205128205129%
Price, $
$82.8
48%
FPS Winner
Intel BX80646I34370 Core i3-4370 Haswell Dual-Core 3.8GHz LGA 1150 54W Desktop Processor
Buy for $82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350019 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
198
92.95774647887323%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350017 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
47.622950819672134%
Multi-Core
992
41.21312837557125%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
