Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 961 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $39.95 vs $99.97
- Up to 59% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.14 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 5% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G3900 - 291 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
276
94.84536082474226%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349586 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
291
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
41.1764705882353%
Price, $
$99.97
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349587 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
46.96847210994341%
Multi-Core
992
18.84856545696371%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |